Comparing E333III - Tricalcium citrate vs E553 - Magnesium silicates

Synonyms
E333iii
Tricalcium citrate
E553
Magnesium silicates
magnesium silicate
Products

Found in 4 products

Found in 173 products

Search rank & volume
#357300 / mo🇺🇸U.S.
#2791.1K / mo🇺🇸U.S.
Awareness score

×5.43
over-aware

×0.94
normal

Search volume over time

Interest over time for 2 keywords in U.S. during the last 10 years.

Interest over time for 3 keywords in U.S. during the last 10 years.

Popular questions
  1. Is tricalcium phosphate the same as calcium citrate?

    No—tricalcium phosphate (E341iii) and tricalcium citrate (E333iii) are different calcium salts; citrate is more soluble and mainly used as a sequestrant/stabilizer and calcium fortificant, while phosphate is often an anti-caking agent and fortificant.

  2. Is tricalcium citrate bad for you?

    No—tricalcium citrate (E333iii) is approved in the EU and generally recognized as safe in the U.S. at typical food levels; excessive calcium from any source can cause GI discomfort or contribute to kidney stones in susceptible people.

  3. What is tricalcium citrate used for?

    It’s used as a sequestrant and stabilizer to control acidity and bind metal ions, helping preserve color and texture, and it’s also used to fortify foods and supplements with calcium.

  4. Which is better calcium citrate vs tricalcium phosphate?

    For calcium supplementation/absorption, calcium citrate is often preferred because it’s more soluble and can be taken with or without food; tricalcium phosphate is less soluble but useful in foods as an anti-caking agent and when added phosphorus is desired.

  5. Which is easier to absorb tricalcium pjosphatw or calcium citrate?

    Calcium citrate is generally easier to absorb than tricalcium phosphate, especially on an empty stomach; phosphate salts are better absorbed when taken with meals.

  1. What is magnesium aluminum silicate?

    A refined clay mineral of magnesium, aluminum and silicate layers used mainly as a thickener/stabilizer and anti‑caking agent, similar in function to the magnesium silicates covered by E553 (e.g., talc/magnesium silicate).

  2. Is magnesium aluminum silicate safe?

    Yes—when of food/cosmetic grade and used as authorized, it’s considered safe; it is insoluble, minimally absorbed, and specifications require it to be asbestos‑free and low in heavy metals.

  3. Does magnesium aluminum silicate cause cancer?

    There’s no evidence it causes cancer when asbestos‑free and used as intended; cancer concerns mainly involve inhalation of asbestos‑contaminated talc, not food/cosmetic‑grade materials.

  4. Is magnesium aluminum silicate safe for skin?

    Yes—cosmetic safety reviews consider it safe as used; it largely sits on the skin with minimal absorption, though avoiding inhalation of powders is advisable.

  5. Is magnesium silicate harmful?

    Food‑grade magnesium silicate (E553) is generally considered safe at permitted levels and is poorly absorbed; the main risks relate to inhaling fine talc dust or using non‑food‑grade/asbestos‑contaminated material.